PROVING THE CRIME OF WITCHCRAFT IN SYARIAH COURT IN MALAYSIA: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

Muhammad Hafiy Irfan Mohammad; Amalina Ahmad Tajudin

Authors

Muhammad Hafiy Irfan Mohammad Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Amalina Ahmad Tajudin Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Keywords:

Witchcraft law, issues and challenges, Syariah Court

Abstract

This study provides an abstract survey on the crime of witchcraft in Malaysia, especially in relation to the issues and challenges of proving the crime in the Syariah Court in Malaysia. One of the main challenges found in this study is that the jurisdiction that manages and handles witchcraft-related crimes in Malaysia is still not yet been established. Furthermore, the research problem that exists is related to the guidelines for convicting witchcraft in Syariah courts. Therefore, challenges arise in determine the parameters of the extent to which an offense is identified as a crime of witchcraft. Based on this research, there are several objectives to be achieved, among them are to identify the positive effects of the enactment of laws, Investigating the process of proving the crime of witchcraft in Syariah Court, analyse the issues and challenges in proving the crime of witchcraft and also examining their solutions to address them. This study also uses qualitative methods in obtaining information. While the findings for this study are benefits of witchcraft law, process of proving the crime, challenges in proving the crime of witchcraft and solutions to address issues and challenges. The conclusion that can be made based on this study is that although this crime of witchcraft is a crime that is difficult to prove, it is not impossible to make it happen with joint efforts from various parties. The significant of this research are it can contribute to legal development, community protection and strengthen Syariah legal institutions in Malaysia. Therefore, it will contribute to international scholars in terms of the latest information and data related to witchcraft crimes in Malaysia, challenges and solutions in strengthening the witchcraft crime laws as well as ideas in the implementation of the special body regarding witchcraft crimes.

References

Abdul Aziz, M. A., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021). The Proof of Witchcraft Offence in Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence: An Analysis from the Perspective of Malaysian Syariah Criminal Procedure. Journal of Shariah Law Research, 6(2), 36-47.

Abdul Hamid, A. R., & Abdullah, N. (2019). Witchcraft in Malaysia: An Analysis of Legal Framework and Challenges in the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 9(9), 27-37.

Alias, M. A. A. ., Wan Ismail, W. A. F. ., Baharuddin, A. S. ., & Abdul Mutalib, L. . (2021). Legal Analysis of Syariah Court Evidence Law on Digital Document as Evidence and Its Admissibility in Court Proceedings: Analisis Perundangan bagi Undang-Undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah terhadap Dokumen Digital sebagai Kaedah Pembuktian dan Kebolehterimaannya dalam Prosiding Mahkamah . Journal of Management and Muamalah , 11(2), 54 - 64. Retrieved from https://jmm.uis.edu.my/index.php/jurnal/article/view/102

Hamzan, M., Khairuldin, W. M. K. F. W., & Muda, T. F. M. T. (2021). Keterangan Pakar Pengubatan Islam sebagai Pendapat Pakar bagi kes melibatkan Sihir di Mahkamah Syariah [Evidence of Islamic Medical Experts As Expert Opinions For Cases Involving Magic In Syariah Courts]. International Journal of Contemporary Education, Religious Studies and Humanities, 1(1), 12-25.

Mahyuddin Ismail (2010), “Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Jenayah Sihir Di Malaysia : Isu Dan Cabarannya” Kertas persidangan, Seminar Undang-Undang Jenayah Sihir, Kolej Antarabangsa IKIP, Dewan Utama Kompleks Yayasan Pahang, Tanjung Lumpur, Kuantan, 11 Oktober 2010

Muhammad ‘Ali al-Sabuni, Rawai’ al-Bayan (1981) (Damsyiq : Maktabat al-Ghazali), 1: 101.

Mustafa, M. K. (2020). The Criminalization of Black Magic in Malaysia: A Comparative Study. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 23(4), p.1-10.

Na’imah, S. (2014). Prospek pemakaian qarinah dan pendapat pakar dalam pembuktian Jenayah sihir/Na’imah Suleiman (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Malaya).

Nasri, M. S. (2015). Jenayah sihir di Malaysia: permasalahan dan cadangan pelaksanaan undang-undang. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, p.19, 51.

Nasri, M. S., Ismail, M. A. M., Yaziz, A. S. A., & Samuri, A. A. (2017). Keterangan Pakar Sebagai Cara Pembuktian di Mahkamah Syariah. In Kertas kerja dibentangkan di E-Proceeding of the 4th World Conference on Integration of Knowledge, p.78-86

Omar, A., & Rosman, A. S. (2009). Persepsi pelajar SPI UTM berkenaan karamah dan sihir (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia).

Osman, K. M. A. K., Hussin, M. N. M., & Ngspar, R. S. (2023). Pembubaran Perkahwinan Kerana Sihir: Kajian Di Negeri Selangor [Dissolution Of Marriages Due To Witchcraft: A Study In The State Of Selangor]. QALAM International Journal of Islamic and Humanities Research, 3(2).

Petrus, T. S. (2009). An anthropological study of witchcraft-related crime in the Eastern Cape and its implications for law enforcement policy and practice (Doctoral dissertation).

Salhab, B. B. S., & Muhsin, S. M. (2024). Examination of evidence of lineage in the light of themes of worship and reasoning: A conceptual and analytical study. (2024). Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 701-725. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.788

Sheikh Abdul Wahid Salam Al-Bali (2002), Sihir Dan Pengubatannya Menurut Islam, terj. Annur Rafiq Shaleh Tamhid (Kuala Lumpur : Crescent News Sdn Bhd,)

Wahid, N. F. B., & Wahid, A. (2014) Transformasi Dalam Perundangan: Langkah-Langkah Yang Boleh Diambil Oleh Mahkamah Syariah Di Malaysia Dalam Menangani Jenayah Sihir., p.20-27.

Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Mutalib, L. A., & Alias, M. A. A. (2021). A systematic analysis on the admissibility of digital documents as evidence in Malaysian Syariah courts. Pertanika Journal: Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(3), 1981-1996.