LEGAL VALIDITY OF AI EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL CASES WITHIN SHARIAH COURT OF MALAYSIA

‘Aini Nur’aqilah Zabidi; Zizi Azlinda Mohd Yusof

Authors

‘Aini Nur’aqilah Zabidi Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Zizi Azlinda Mohd Yusof Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, validity, evidence, criminal cases, Shariah court

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, including AI algorithms and digital evidence such as CCTV footage, has become increasingly prevalent in legal proceedings. This trend raises questions about the validity and admissibility of AI-generated evidence in Shariah court proceedings. While specific guidelines exist for the use of evidence in Shariah courts, the application of AI technology in this context requires careful scrutiny to ensure justice for all parties involved. This study aims to examine the legal validity and admissibility of AI-generated evidence within the framework of the Shariah Court Evidence Enactment of Malaysia. The research employs a qualitative methodology, primarily involving a comprehensive literature review of relevant scholarly articles. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with experts in AI and Islamic law are conducted to gather insights on the legal validity of AI evidence in Shariah criminal proceedings. Findings suggest a potential connection between AI-generated evidence and the types of digital documents and evidence already recognized in the Shariah court enactment. This connection may provide a basis for considering the validity and admissibility of AI-generated evidence in Shariah courts. The research aims to contribute to the alignment of legal proceedings with the principles of fairness and transparency inherent in Islamic jurisprudence. By addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by AI technology in Shariah courts, this study seeks to reinforce public trust in the legal system while ensuring adherence to Islamic legal principles.

References

Abdul Ghani, H. (2020). Takzir dan pelaksanaannya di Malaysia. E-Journal Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Sultan Ismail Petra.

Abdul Mutalib, L., & Wan Ismail, W. A. F. (2012). Al-Qarinah: Antara kekuatan dan keperluan dalam mensabitkan kesalahan Jenayah (zina). International Journal of Islamic Thought, 2. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.2.2012.004

Abualfaraj, M. (2011). Evidence in Islamic law: Reforming the Islamic evidence law based on the federal rules of evidence. Journal of Islamic Law and Culture, 13(2–3), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528817x.2012.733130

Ahmad, M. H., Baharuddin, A. S., Zakaria, M. A., Nordin, N., Ishak, S. K., & Othman, N. K. (2020). Bukti saintifik dan penerimaannya di Mahkamah Syariah: Analisis perundangan bagi Undang-Undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 32(1), 67-92.

Ahmad, M. H., Razak, R., Saharudin, N. S., & Hashim, H. (2019). Epistemologi fiqh forensik: Titik pertemuan antara sains dengan Syariah. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337680192

Aizah Rashid, A. M. N. H. F. M. N. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence and the necessary for innovations in Islamic criminal law.

Alias, M. (2023). Forensic science and its application in documentary evidence in Malaysian Syariah Courts. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia, 36(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.37052/kanun.36(1)no6

Alias, M. A. A. (2022). The falsification of documents in marriage cases under the civil and Syariah courts in Malaysia: An appraisal analysis. (Master’s dissertation). Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan.

Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., & Abdul Mutalib, L. (2021a). The application of forensic science element in documentary evidence: A review in Malaysian Syariah Court. Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Management and Muamalah, Faculty of Management and Muamalah, Kolej Universiti Islam Selangor, 268-276.

Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., & Abdul Mutalib, L. (2021b). Legal analysis of Syariah court evidence law on digital document as evidence and its admissibility in court proceedings: Analisis perundangan bagi Undang-Undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah terhadap dokumen digital sebagai kaedah pembuktian dan kebolehterimaannya dalam prosiding mahkamah. Journal of Management and Muamalah, 11(2), 54-64.

Al-Qurtubi, M. (2006). Al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qur'ān (Sunt. A. A. Muhsin & R. Arqaswasi. Ed. 1. Jil. 11). Beirut: Mu'asasah al-Risalah.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and the legal profession | The Law Society. (2018, May 1). Retrieved from https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/research/ai-artificial-intelligence-and-the-legal-profession

Artificial Intelligence as Evidence. (2021, December 3). Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. Retrieved from https://jtip.law.northwestern.edu/issues/artificial-intelligence-as-evidence/

Baharuddin, A. P. (2023, December). DNA analysis in terms of Artificial Intelligence as evidence. (A. N. Zabidi, Interviewer).

Bu, Q. (2021). The global governance on automated facial recognition (AFR): Ethical and legal opportunities and privacy challenges. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 2(1), 113–145.

Elmahjub, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic ethics: Towards pluralist ethical benchmarking for AI. Philosophy & Technology, 36(73).

Fajaryati, N., Budiyono, B., Akhyar, M., & Wiranto, W. (2020). The employability skills needed to face the demands of work in the future: Systematic literature reviews. Open Engineering, 10(1), 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0072

Hall, S. W., Sakzad, A., & Choo, K. R. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence for digital forensics. WIREs Forensic Science, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1434

Hanafi. (n.d.). Kisah 25 Nabi dan Rasul. Jakarta: Bintang Indonesia.

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (n.d.). 2019 systems of signals generating and processing in the field of on board communications: 20-21 March 2019, Moscow Technical University of Communication and Informatics, Moscow, Russian Federation.

International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA). (2023, December 7). The disparity of digital evidence admissibility in Islamic Sharia Courts. Retrieved from https://www.ibima.org/

Jasmi, K. A. (2012). Metodologi pengumpulan data dalam penyelidikan kualitatif. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293097563

Kallil, M. K., & Che Yaacob, A. (2019). The integration of digital forensics science and Islamic evidence laws. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 4(17), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.417006

Malaysian Legislation. (2006). Syariah Court Evidence (Federal Territories) Act 1997. Retrieved from CommonLII: http://www.commonlii.org/my/legis/consol_act/sceta1997415/

Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan Bagi Hal Ehwal Ugama Islam Malaysia: Hukum Menggunakan DNA Untuk Menentukan Status Nasab Anak Dan Tempoh Melaksanakan Li’an Untuk Menafikan Nasab Anak. (2012). JAKIM : E-SMAF V1. http://e-smaf.islam.gov.my/e-smaf/index.php/main/mainv1/fatwa/pr/10304

Noor, M., Mohd, D., & Abdullah, S. (n.d.). Satu kajian mengenai penggunaan cap jari menurut perspektif fiqh Islam A study on the use of fingerprints according to the fiqhs of Islam. In Jurnal Perspektif Jil. 2 Bil (Vol. 2).

Rigano, C. (2019). Using artificial intelligence to address criminal justice needs (NIJ Journal 280).

Rosili, N. A. K., Zakaria, N. H., Hassan, R., Kasim, S., Rose, F. Z. C., & Sutikno, T. (2021). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10(4), 1091–1102. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJAI.V10.I4.PP1091-1102

Ruzman, O., & Noor, M. (n.d.). Kesaksian dalam konteks Undang-Undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia: Analisis dari perspektif Mazhab Syafi’i.

Sanghvi, H., Ling, J. S. W., Tay, E. S., & Kuek, C. Y. (2022). Digitalisation of judiciary in Malaysia: Application of artificial intelligence in the sentencing process. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Law and Digitalization (ICLD 2022) (pp. 91–97). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-59-6_9

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center of Homeland Security, D., Directorate, T., Security Enterprise, H., & Responders Group, F. (2013). System assessment and validation for emergency responders (SAVER) CCTV technology handbook Atlantic.

Taib, M. A. (2023, December 9). Artificial intelligence as evidence in Shariah Court of Malaysia. (A. N. Zabidi, Interviewer).

Ugwu, C. N., & Val, E. (2023). Qualitative research. Idosr Journal of Computer and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 20–35. www.idosr.org

Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Abdul Mutalib, L., Baharuddin., A. S., Abdullah Kahar, N. S., & Alias, M. A. A. (2023). Keperluan prosedur operasi standard dalam penerimaan dokumen digital di mahkamah sivil Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 14(1), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.1.14

Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Abdul Shukor, S., Hashim, H., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2018). Pembuktian melalui televisyen/ kamera litar tertutup (CCTV) dalam kes-kes Jenayah: Tinjauan umum berdasarkan Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam: Evidence obtained through CCTV in criminal cases: An overview from an Islamic legal perspective on the law of evidence. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol6no1.101

Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Abdul Mutalib, L., & Alias, M. A. A. (2020). The admissibility of digital document according to Syariah law: A preliminary analysis. INSLA E-Proceedings, 3(1), 471-480. Retrieved from https://insla.usim.edu.my/index.php/eproceeding/article/view/53

Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Abdul Mutalib, L., & Alias, M. A. A. (2021). An appraisal of digital documents as evidence in Islamic law. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 198. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0076

Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Mutalib, L. A., & Alias, M. A. A. (2021). A systematic analysis on the admissibility of digital documents as evidence in Malaysian Syariah courts. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(3), 1981–1996. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.26

Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Shukor, S. A., Hashim, H., Mutalib, L. A., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2019). The reality on application and challenges of closed-circuit television (CCTV) images as evidence in Shariah criminal cases in Malaysia. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 356–361. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7661

Wang, P. (2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2019-0002