REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR CRYPTO ASSETS: COMPARATIVE FIQH STUDY BETWEEN MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA

Authors

  • Mohamad Amerzan Mohamad Sobri Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Muneer Ali Abdul Rab Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Keywords:

Regulatory Frameworks, cryptocurrencies, syariah law, Malaysia and Indonesia, Syariah law, challenge

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the regulatory frameworks governing cryptocurrencies in Malaysia and Indonesia through the lens of Islamic law (Shariah), this study sought to address the growing need for clarity regarding the compatibility between these digital assets and the principles of Shariah. With technological advancements rapidly changing the way financial transactions are conducted; it became imperative to assess how governments have adapted their regulatory approaches to accommodate the emergence of crypto assets and to ensure the use of crypto assets align with shariah principle. Utilizing a descriptive qualitative research design, this study provided an in-depth examination of the challenges associated with developing the guideline for Shariah compliant crypto assets while also exploring potential solutions for aligning their usage with the principles of Islamic finance. By integrating theoretical and practical perspectives, this investigation shed light upon the complex issues involved in regulating crypto assets under Shariah, ultimately contributing valuable insights towards improving existing policies governing digital assets particularly in the context of Malaysia.

References

Al-Butary, B., Abd. Majid Butary, M., & Widya, H. (2022). Crypto currency in the perspective of the Fatwa DSN MUI in 2021. Proceedings of International Conference on Science and Technology, Lembaga Penelitian Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Dakwah Islamiyah, Universitas Islam Kuantan Singingi, Indonesia, 112–118.

Bappebti. (2020). Penetapan daftar aset kripto yang diperdagangkan di pasar fisik aset kripto.

Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM). (2020). BNM and SC’s joint response on “policy confusion over cryptocurrencies”.

Government of the State of Indonesia. (2015). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta: The Office of the Registrar and the Secretariat General of the Constitutional of the Republic of Indonesia.

Hamdani, L. (2020). Zakat blockchain: A descriptive qualitative approach. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnes, 492–502.

Han, & Zilling. (2023). The analysis of Bitcoin's price fluctuation. BCP Business and Management, 489–496.

Okhuese, & Victor, A. (2017). READS capital schemas group. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320616742_INTRODUCING_CRYPTOCURRENCY

Raza Rabbani, M., Khan, S., & Thalassinos, E. (2020). Fintech, blockchain and Islamic finance: An extensive literature review. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 65–86.

Securities Commission Malaysia (SC). (2020). Guidelines on digital assets.

SK/Kep. Kepala Bappebti. (2020). Penetapan daftar aset kripto yang dapat diperdagangkan di pasar fisik aset kripto. Peraturan Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi, Nomor 7.

SK/Kep. Kepala Bappebti. (2020). Penetapan daftar aset kripto yang dapat diperdagangkan di pasar fisik aset kripto. Peraturan Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi, Article 1 paragraph (1).

Susilowardhani, Sekar Bidari, A., & Nurviana, R. (2022). Regulation and the future of cryptocurrency in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(3), 1–10.

Widjaja, G. (2019). Legality of cryptocurrency in Indonesia. Advances on Business Research International Journal.

Widjaja, G. (2019). The legal status of cryptocurrency in Indonesia. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 5(3), 76–80.

Bakker, T., Reerink, G., & Nurmansyah, E. (2015, August 27). Regulation on mandatory use of Rupiah and prohibition of dual price denomination. ABNR Counsellors at Law. Retrieved from https://www.abnrlaw.com/news/regulation-on-mandatory-use-of-rupiah-and-prohibition-of-dual-price-denomination

Capital Market and Services Act (CMSA). (2019, January 8). Capital Market and Services Act 2007. Retrieved from https://www.sc.com.my/api/documentms/download.ashx?id=8c8bc467-c750-466e-9a86-98c12fec4a77

Capital Market Malaysia. (2020, July). Digital asset exchange. Retrieved from https://www.capitalmarketsmalaysia.com/digital-digital-asset-exchange/#:~:text=Members%20of%20the%20public%20cannot,%2C%20Ripple%2C%20Solana%20and%20Uniswap

Securities Commission Malaysia (SC). (2020, October 28). Guidelines on digital assets. Retrieved from https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/guidelines/digital-assets

Securities Commission Malaysia (SC). (2021, July 30). SC takes enforcement actions on Binance for illegally operating in Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.sc.com.my/resources/media/media-release/sc-takes-enforcement-actions-on-binance-for-illegally-operating-in-malaysia

Bank Indonesia. (2011). Indonesia currency (Law 7/2011) (17/3/PBI/2015).

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Mohamad Sobri, M. A., & Abdul Rab, M. A. (2024). REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR CRYPTO ASSETS: COMPARATIVE FIQH STUDY BETWEEN MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA. SALAM Digest: Syariah and Law Undergraduate Symposium, 2(1), 66–77. Retrieved from https://salam.usim.edu.my/index.php/salamdigest/article/view/54

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles